|
return to main page
ARTICLES:
THE STANDARD LINE ON
THE ECONOMY
PRESS COVERAGE OF
LEAKS AND WIRETAPS
TERRORIST AIR TIME
media irresponsibility
ON DEFINING THE WAR?
THE RIGHT QUESTIONS
IN THE WAR ON TERROR
bio weapons labs:
DEMONIZING THE MEDIA
WMD
History Rewrite
Dancing on the Edge
Misconstruing the
Constitution
FISA AND WIRETAP
SECRECY
MORE ON THE WIRETAP
ISSUE
THE DEMOCRATS AND
HARRY TAYLOR
FIXING THE ENGINE
THE BUSH ADMIN'
ENVIRONMENTAL
RECORD, AND MORE
THE CURRENT
ADMINISTRATION
OBSESSION WITH
SECRECY
THE 2004 ELECTION
INTERNET LIMITATIONS
STARTLING REVELATIONS
ON 9/11 INTELLIGENCE
return to main page |
|
"Have you noticed you
don't see those Taco Bell ads anymore? Remember the ones that said,
'Make a run for the border?' For some reason those seem to have fallen
out of Favor," ~Jay Leno
IMMIGRATION BACKWARDNESS
On the Immigration issue today, properly enforcing
immigration policy and laws, is being commingled, and mistaken with,
anti immigration.
People are responsible, first and
foremost, for their own country. There is also no reason that those who came
here illegally should get priority over their country mates back home.
It is not a question of "human dignity," as is constantly
suggested. These immigrants did nothing morally wrong. To enforce
our immigration laws is NOT saying that they did, only that our
immigration laws matter.
Likewise, to say that immigrants "contributed" to our economy is
meaningless. This, again is not to disparage immigrants who
understandably came here in violation of U.S. immigration law. But that
contribution was a benefit to the illegal immigrants who chose this
path, and was outweighed by the cost of social and governmental services
in return (this is basic economics 101 with respect to low paying jobs).
Again, this does not mean they did anything wrong, it just means that
once again, a false argument has been parroted across the country as
part of the latest popular position of the moment.
If you think that our immigration laws are too restrictive, that is one
thing. Perhaps, by some perspectives, they are. Since we are today a
mature and overpopulated country, we think the opposite is and has been
the better argument for some time. But that is a matter of
subjective opinion. If you think otherwise, then make that case.
But this is different than doing an end run around the real inquiry with
misleading arguments, simply because seemingly everyone but "far right"
conservatives is making them -- about how it is an issue of fairness,
when it is not fair to their fellow countrymen, or about dignity, when
it is not undignified to courteously enforce immigration laws, or about
net "economics," when that argument is economically backwards.
Moreover, the argument that immigrants will "do jobs that no Americans
will do" is demeaning, and crass. As is the idea of "guest
workers" who in effect serve as second class citizens, to do our dirty
work in return for their "better opportunity." It is demeaning to
American workers, and to immigrants, and degrades the concept that any
work that needs to be done, and that is done honorably, is honorable.
Once again, the large gap between rhetoric and reality under current far
right wing leadership continues, as immigration policies
have been more
uniformly and consistently enforced under the previous democratic
administration, than under the current Bush administration. Yet in
the meantime, seemingly now as a response to the far right wing
cacophony, our President -- who on this of all positions has decided not
to adopt even the right wing perspective -- we are suddenly
sending
National Guard units to our national borders? Where has reasonable
enforcement been for the past five years? And how is the
consideration of various programs to grant work status and/or
citizenship to those who have crossed those borders and remained here
illegally, consistent with
sending the National Guard to those very same
borders?
Copyright 2006 PresstheNews.com |









|